Tracing the Threads of Faith: A Review of David Bebbington’s Patterns in History

The image of the cover comes from ThriftBooks. There many different images for the book cover.

David W. Bebbington’s Patterns in History is one of those academic books that wears its ambition lightly. In fewer than 250 pages, it manages to cover what feels like thousands of years of historical thought without feeling like a rushed tour. The objective for Bebbington? To trace the different ways people have made sense of history—from ancient myth to modern postmodernism—and show how Christianity offers a compelling framework to make sense of it all.

Bebbington doesn’t waste time. He begins things off by asking a deceptively simple question: what is history? Right from the start, he draws a sharp line between two meanings—history as the past itself, and history as what we write about that past. This distinction might seem academic, but it sets the stage for everything that follows. After all, if history is both what happened and how we talk about it, then the historian's perspective, tools, and assumptions matter deeply (Bebbington 3).

Bebbington uses the early chapters to lay out his six “patterns” of historical thinking, each treated with balance and clarity. First is Cyclical History—the idea that events just repeat themselves in endless loops. It’s an old concept, tied to nature and myth, and it turns out to be surprisingly influential even in modern times (Bebbington 21). But then Bebbington contrasts this with the Christian view: history with a direction. Not a circle, but a line. A beginning, a middle, and a God-ordained end—judgment and mercy.

From there, he moves through the Enlightenment idea of Progress, with its cheery optimism about human improvement—but with no type of divine guidance. That leads naturally into Historicism, which insists on viewing every culture in its own context—no universal standards allowed. Marxism gets its own chapter, centered on the idea that economic forces drive history. And finally, we get Postmodernism, which doubts whether any of us can really know what happened at all.

Each chapter does more than explain ideas. Bebbington also evaluates them. And here’s where his Christian perspective quietly comes into view. He doesn’t dismiss other views out of hand. Quite the opposite—he treats them seriously, even sympathetically. But he also shows where they fall short. Enlightenment thinkers, for example, saw only the bright side of humanity. Nineteenth-century historicists saw mostly the darkness. Christianity, he argues, sees both: humans as made in God’s image and marked by sin. It's this moral complexity that gives the Christian view its depth (Bebbington 187).

While Bebbington acknowledges that other schools of thought contain partial truths, he ultimately argues that only the Christian worldview can integrate these insights into a coherent, morally grounded framework. He demonstrates that Christianity doesn't just borrow selectively from cyclical order, Enlightenment hope, or historicist empathy—it weaves them together under the broader narrative of divine providence. Unlike the competing theories, which tend to collapse under their own contradictions, the Christian approach retains both moral clarity and interpretive depth without falling into extremes (Bebbington 193-194).

One of the book's most insightful claims is that historical knowledge is always based on probability, not certainty. We don’t have a direct line to the past, only bits of evidence—some reliable, some not—and historians have to interpret them. Even something as basic as Napoleon’s existence, Bebbington reminds us (drawing from Richard Whately), is technically open to doubt, but overwhelmingly probable (Bebbington 8). That doesn’t make history arbitrary. It just means that writing history is more like building a legal case than reporting the weather.

Bebbington also reflects on what it means to be a Christian historian. He doesn’t argue for slipping Bible verses into footnotes. Instead, he encourages Christian scholars to write with integrity—doing good history, grounded in careful research, while still acknowledging a providential view of the past (Bebbington 204). This is one of the book’s quiet strengths. It’s not just about ideas; it’s also about vocation.

Patterns in History isn’t just a history of historical thinking. It’s an invitation to think about how we think about history—and to consider whether our assumptions about the past can really stand on their own. Bebbington offers a clear, balanced introduction to major theories of history, yet by the final chapter, he makes a firm case that the Christian worldview is not only adequate but necessary for interpreting history meaningfully. In his view, it alone can explain both the tragedy and hope woven through the human story.

Patterns in History is available for purchase through Amazon and Barnes & Noble, with the 2018 edition priced around $39.99 in paperback and $54.99 in hardcover. A digital version is also offered through Barnes & Noble’s Nook platform for the same price. While a free version of the book can be accessed on the Internet Archive, it is the older 1990 edition and does not include the updated chapter on postmodernism found in the latest release. For those engaging with the full scope of Bebbington’s argument, the 2018 edition is the most complete and current.